Key Differences Between PMax and Standard Shopping Campaigns

Key Differences Between PMax and Standard Shopping Campaigns

While both Performance Max (PMax) and Standard Shopping campaigns are essential tools for advertisers, they differ significantly in terms of placement options, bidding strategies, channel integration, and the level of control offered. Here’s a closer look at these distinctions:

1. Ad Placements: Access to YouTube Search

One of the major benefits of using PMax over Standard Shopping is its expanded ad placements, particularly the ability to show Product Listing Ads (PLAs) on YouTube Search.

• PMax: In addition to appearing on Google Search and the Shopping tab, PMax enables PLAs to be displayed across the Google ecosystem, including YouTube, Gmail, and Discover. This broader reach helps advertisers capture attention across more high-traffic channels, particularly on platforms like YouTube Search, where shopping ads aren’t typically displayed.
• Standard Shopping: Shopping campaigns, while effective at targeting high-intent users, are limited in terms of placements. They only display ads on Google Search, the Shopping tab, and certain partner websites. This means Shopping campaigns don’t have access to YouTube or Gmail, limiting the visibility of PLAs to search-heavy environments.

2. PMax Cannibalization: Impact on Video, Display, and Search

It’s important to recognize that PMax is more than just a Shopping campaign—it has a broader scope that extends beyond shopping ads to include Video, Display, and Search ads. This can lead to a cannibalization effect, especially in areas like remarketing and branded search.

• Video and Display (Remarketing): When running PMax, expect it to take over a significant portion of your Display and Video campaigns, especially remarketing. Since PMax has access to Google’s entire inventory, it’s designed to optimize across channels, meaning your standalone Display or Video campaigns may see reduced impressions or clicks as PMax draws budget from them.
• Search: PMax also impacts Search ads, particularly branded search campaigns. Google’s machine learning algorithms may prioritize PMax when determining which ads to show, sometimes at the expense of your Search campaigns, which could lead to PMax cannibalizing branded and non-branded Search traffic. This can make it harder to control specific search campaigns and could impact how your ads appear for high-intent queries.
• Shopping: PMax naturally overlaps with Shopping campaigns, but unlike Standard Shopping, it doesn't allow you to manually control placements for Shopping ads. The cross-channel nature of PMax means Shopping ads could be deprioritized in favor of other ad types, leading to less visibility for high-intent product searches.

By understanding this cannibalization effect, it’s crucial to monitor overall performance and ensure that the channels most important to your business goals aren't being overshadowed by PMax’s automation.

3. Bidding Strategies: Max Conversion Value vs. Target ROAS

Another key difference between PMax and Shopping campaigns lies in the bidding strategies available.

• Performance Max: PMax offers Max Conversion Value, a bidding strategy that isn’t available in Standard Shopping. This strategy is designed to maximize the total value of conversions (e.g., revenue) within your budget. It can be particularly useful for businesses that want to generate the highest possible return across multiple conversion types or products without setting a specific return on ad spend (ROAS) target.
• Standard Shopping: In contrast, Shopping campaigns only offer Target ROAS as an automated bidding strategy. While Target ROAS is a powerful tool for optimizing spend based on desired returns, it doesn’t offer the same flexibility as Max Conversion Value. For some businesses, focusing solely on ROAS might be too narrow if there’s value in maximizing conversions based on other KPIs, such as average order value (AOV) or customer lifetime value (CLV).
• Portfolio Bidding Strategies: In Shopping campaigns, portfolio bid strategies are available, giving marketers the flexibility to group multiple campaigns together under a single bidding strategy and set limits like Max CPC (Cost Per Click). This control can be especially useful for advertisers who want to balance profitability while ensuring they don’t overspend on certain campaigns.
• PMax Limitations: Unlike Shopping, PMax does not support portfolio bidding strategies or the ability to set Max CPC limits, meaning advertisers rely on Google’s machine learning algorithms to determine bids. This can result in less precise control over spending, making it more difficult to ensure profitability in certain scenarios.

4. Website Structure and Landing Pages: Limited Control in PMax

For large websites, particularly those with multiple product lines and unique landing pages, PMax's structure can be limiting compared to Search or Shopping campaigns.

• Search Campaigns: When using Search campaigns, advertisers have the ability to create multiple ad groups targeting specific keywords, which can each point to unique landing pages. This level of control allows brands to craft highly tailored ad copy and landing page experiences, ensuring that visitors land on the most relevant pages based on their search intent.
• PMax: In contrast, PMax does not typically involve creating a large number of asset groups for each unique landing page. Instead, PMax automatically directs users to what Google’s algorithm deems the most appropriate landing page based on the assets you upload and user behavior. This can be a downside for large websites or brands with complex product offerings, as it limits the ability to manually specify landing pages for different ad groups or segments.

For example, when working with a large DTC brand that has a wide array of unique landing pages, the lack of control in PMax can make it harder to ensure that users land on the most relevant page for their search or browsing intent. For brands relying heavily on custom landing pages, this can be a significant limitation compared to Search or Shopping campaigns where more control is afforded.

5. Automation vs. Control

• PMax: The automation in PMax can be both a strength and a limitation. PMax automates bidding, placements, and targeting using Google’s machine learning, freeing up time for marketers. However, this comes with less control over where ads appear, who sees them, and how budgets are allocated across placements.
• Standard Shopping: While Standard Shopping doesn’t have the same breadth of placements, it provides more granular control over bids, keywords, and ad formats. Marketers can fine-tune their campaigns based on specific product performance, giving them more direct influence over each element of their strategy.

Conclusion

When deciding between Performance Max and Standard Shopping, advertisers should weigh the pros and cons of each based on their business needs. PMax’s ability to offer broader placements, like YouTube Search, and advanced bidding strategies, like Max Conversion Value, can make it a powerful tool for scaling and automating campaigns. However, businesses that need more granular control, access to portfolio bidding strategies, or the ability to limit Max CPC may find Standard Shopping to be a better fit. Furthermore, the potential for PMax to cannibalize Video, Display, and Search campaigns needs to be carefully considered, especially if these channels are critical to your overall strategy. And, for large websites with complex landing page structures, the limited ability to create numerous asset groups in PMax can be a downside compared to Search or Shopping campaigns.

‍

‍